Tag: Political Power

Turmoil in the City

Wow. The City of Bastrop attorney has resigned. And, his resignation letter should be front page reading for every City of Bastrop resident and taxpayer.

BojorquezResignation

“Given the current climate at City Hall, I have determined our present relationship is not sustainable,” he stated.

He continued, “the time has come to acknowledge that the irreconcilable
differences among the city’s leaders have placed me and my team in an untenable position.”

According to Community Impact, his seven years of service included “a period of ‘tremendous’ change, including five city managers, four chiefs of police, three judges, three mayors pro-tem and two mayors […].”

This isn’t change. It’s turmoil. This isn’t governance. It’s chaos.

His letter opines “While we continue to have confidence in our expertise as Municipal Lawyers, Bastrop is engaged in a transition that is best left to proceed without my staff’s involvement (and without me overseeing your legal matters).”

Translation: The City Council doesn’t listen to expert legal advice and goes off in whatever direction the majority sees fit whether or not it’s appropriate and to the benefit of the residents and taxpayers. In my experience, even if there are major differences of opinions and/or personality conflicts, as long as an entity is following sound legal advice, the lawyer stays on. But when a highly qualified legal advisor steps away saying they are going to “redirect [their] energies” and “allow [the City Council] the opportunity to continue upon [their] trajectory”, that should terrify every taxpayer and resident of the City.

My guess? The City Council will hire in-house counsel, a lawyer who will do what they say because his or her livelihood depends on it. That person will walk the proverbial fence, legally, trying to mold the law into the quest of this City Council majority for power. That lawyer will stay silent while the rights of the minority members, and thus their constituents, are trampled.

This is exactly how corruption takes seed. There is no one outside the circle of power minding the store. Bojorquez’ letter is a warning shot across the bow. Bastrop residents best beware.

The Man Who Would be King

There are those who choose to work together cooperatively. Typically, those are people who have a goal and understand that others share that same goal. They understand that it takes many ideas and many hands to achieve the goal. They are inclusive, good listeners, and incorporate others’ ideas into a strategic plan. And, they understand that those working for the goal all have talents that are needed to achieve the goal, like individual puzzle pieces creating an entire picture.

Then there are those who want to control everything. To these types of people, having control is as important as (or more important than) accomplishing the goal. They want to pick the players and control the strategy. They will determine, on their own, the road to take to achieving the goal. They will exclude free thinkers, new ideas, and different ways of looking at the steps needed to accomplish the goal. To them, power is everything.

In the end, king-makers fail, just as in the Rudyard Kipling novella and 1975 movie of the same name “The Man Who Would be King”.

Political leaders often fall into these categories as well. There are those who are quite willing to work together with other political organizations to achieve the common goal: winning elections. They understand “strength in numbers” and that everyone has something to offer, some talent in which they excel.

Then there are those who refuse to work cooperatively, sometimes to the point of attempting to sabotage and snuff out related groups working for the same goal.

We call individuals who do this bullies. We identify them as insecure people who are threatened by others’ successes. We say they don’t “play well in the sandbox”. The same can be true of organizations. As Patrick Henry so well stated in 1799, “Let us trust God, and our better judgment to set us right hereafter. United we stand, divided we fall.”

The unfortunate result of this refusal to work together, especially in the political world, is disharmony, distrust, dissension. Participants become disillusioned and stop participating. When that happens, the goal becomes unachievable. In the political world, that translates to losses at the polls.

As in the Bible, Matthew 12:25, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand.”

As per the novella and movie, “The Man Who Would be King” won’t recognize that until it’s too late and the opposing political party has seized control.